Beeby, M., Ferreira, J. L., Tripp, P., Albers, S. V. & Mitchell, D. R. Propulsive nanomachines: the convergent evolution of archaella, flagella and cilia. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 44, 253–304 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Mondino, S., San Martin, F. & Buschiazzo, A. 3D cryo-EM imaging of bacterial flagella: novel structural and mechanistic insights into cell motility. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 102105 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Minamino, T. & Kinoshita, M. Structure, assembly, and function of flagella responsible for bacterial locomotion. EcoSal Plus 11, eesp00112023 (2023).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Zhou, J., Lloyd, S. A. & Blair, D. F. Electrostatic interactions between rotor and stator in the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6436–6441 (1998).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Johnson, S. et al. Symmetry mismatch in the MS-ring of the bacterial flagellar rotor explains the structural coordination of secretion and rotation. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 966–975 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Johnson, S. et al. Molecular structure of the intact bacterial flagellar basal body. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 712–721 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Johnson, S., Kuhlen, L., Deme, J. C., Abrusci, P. & Lea, S. M. The structure of an injectisome export gate demonstrates conservation of architecture in the core export gate between flagellar and virulence type III secretion systems. MBio 10, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00818-19 (2019).
Kato, T., Makino, F., Miyata, T., Horvath, P. & Namba, K. Structure of the native supercoiled flagellar hook as a universal joint. Nat. Commun. 10, 5295 (2019).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Kawamoto, A. et al. Native flagellar MS ring is formed by 34 subunits with 23-fold and 11-fold subsymmetries. Nat. Commun. 12, 4223 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Singh, P. K., Cecchini, G., Nakagawa, T. & Iverson, T. M. CryoEM structure of a post-assembly MS-ring reveals plasticity in stoichiometry and conformation. PLoS ONE 18, e0285343 (2023).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Takekawa, N. et al. Two distinct conformations in 34 FliF subunits generate three different symmetries within the flagellar MS-ring. MBio 12, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03199-20 (2021).
Tan, J. et al. Structural basis of assembly and torque transmission of the bacterial flagellar motor. Cell 184, 2665–2679 e2619 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Yamaguchi, T. et al. Structure of the molecular bushing of the bacterial flagellar motor. Nat. Commun. 12, 4469 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Thomas, D., Morgan, D. G. & DeRosier, D. J. Structures of bacterial flagellar motors from two FliF-FliG gene fusion mutants. J. Bacteriol. 183, 6404–6412 (2001).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Thomas, D. R., Francis, N. R., Xu, C. & DeRosier, D. J. The three-dimensional structure of the flagellar rotor from a clockwise-locked mutant of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 188, 7039–7048 (2006).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Hess, J. F., Oosawa, K., Kaplan, N. & Simon, M. I. Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 53, 79–87 (1988).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Welch, M., Oosawa, K., Aizawa, S. & Eisenbach, M. Phosphorylation-dependent binding of a signal molecule to the flagellar switch of bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8787–8791 (1993).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Cohen-Ben-Lulu, G. N. et al. The bacterial flagellar switch complex is getting more complex. EMBO J. 27, 1134–1144 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Koganitsky, A., Tworowski, D., Dadosh, T., Cecchini, G. & Eisenbach, M. A mechanism of modulating the direction of flagellar rotation in bacteria by fumarate and fumarate reductase. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 3662–3676 (2019).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Zarbiv, G. et al. Energy complexes are apparently associated with the switch-motor complex of bacterial flagella. J. Mol. Biol. 416, 192–207 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Zhang, H. et al. A putative spermidine synthase interacts with flagellar switch protein FliM and regulates motility in Helicobacter pylori. Mol. Microbiol. 106, 690–703 (2017).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Ko, M. & Park, C. Two novel flagellar components and H-NS are involved in the motor function of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 303, 371–382 (2000).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Fang, X. & Gomelsky, M. A post-translational, c-di-GMP-dependent mechanism regulating flagellar motility. Mol. Microbiol. 76, 1295–1305 (2010).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Kaplan, M. et al. In situ imaging of the bacterial flagellar motor disassembly and assembly processes. EMBO J. 38, e100957 (2019).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Kaplan, M. et al. Loss of the bacterial flagellar motor switch complex upon cell lysis. MBio 12, e0029821 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Johnson, S. et al. Structural basis of directonal switching by the bacterial flagellum. Preprint at Research Square, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3417165/v1 (2023).
Lux, R., Kar, N. & Khan, S. Overproduced Salmonella typhimurium flagellar motor switch complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 298, 577–583 (2000).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Fernandez-Gimenez, E. et al. A new algorithm for particle weighted subtraction to decrease signals from unwanted components in single particle analysis. J. Struct. Biol. 215, 108024 (2023).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Brown, P. N., Hill, C. P. & Blair, D. F. Crystal structure of the middle and C-terminal domains of the flagellar rotor protein FliG. EMBO J. 21, 3225–3234 (2002).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Lam, K. H. et al. Multiple conformations of the FliG C-terminal domain provide insight into flagellar motor switching. Structure 20, 315–325 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Lam, K. H. et al. Structural basis of FliG-FliM interaction in Helicobacter pylori. Mol. Microbiol. 88, 798–812 (2013).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Lloyd, S. A., Whitby, F. G., Blair, D. F. & Hill, C. P. Structure of the C-terminal domain of FliG, a component of the rotor in the bacterial flagellar motor. Nature 400, 472–475 (1999).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Lynch, M. J. et al. Co-folding of a FliF-FliG split domain forms the basis of the MS:C ring interface within the bacterial flagellar motor. Structure 25, 317–328 (2017).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Minamino, T. et al. Structural insight into the rotational switching mechanism of the bacterial flagellar motor. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000616 (2011).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Xue, C. et al. Crystal structure of the FliF–FliG complex from Helicobacter pylori yields insight into the assembly of the motor MS-C ring in the bacterial flagellum. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 2066–2078 (2018).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Sircar, R. et al. Assembly states of FliM and FliG within the flagellar switch complex. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 867–886 (2015).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Lee, L. K., Ginsburg, M. A., Crovace, C., Donohoe, M. & Stock, D. Structure of the torque ring of the flagellar motor and the molecular basis for rotational switching. Nature 466, 996–1000 (2010).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Notti, R. Q., Bhattacharya, S., Lilic, M. & Stebbins, C. E. A common assembly module in injectisome and flagellar type III secretion sorting platforms. Nat. Commun. 6, 7125 (2015).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Paul, K., Gonzalez-Bonet, G., Bilwes, A. M., Crane, B. R. & Blair, D. Architecture of the flagellar rotor. EMBO J. 30, 2962–2971 (2011).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Vartanian, A. S., Paz, A., Fortgang, E. A., Abramson, J. & Dahlquist, F. W. Structure of flagellar motor proteins in complex allows for insights into motor structure and switching. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 35779–35783 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Brown, P. N., Mathews, M. A., Joss, L. A., Hill, C. P. & Blair, D. F. Crystal structure of the flagellar rotor protein FliN from Thermotoga maritima. J. Bacteriol. 187, 2890–2902 (2005).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Irikura, V. M., Kihara, M., Yamaguchi, S., Sockett, H. & Macnab, R. M. Salmonella typhimurium fliG and fliN mutations causing defects in assembly, rotation, and switching of the flagellar motor. J. Bacteriol. 175, 802–810 (1993).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Ravid, S., Matsumura, P. & Eisenbach, M. Restoration of flagellar clockwise rotation in bacterial envelopes by insertion of the chemotaxis protein CheY. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 7157–7161 (1986).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Carroll, B. L. et al. The flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus undergoes major structural remodeling during rotational switching. Elife 9, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61446 (2020).
Chang, Y. et al. Molecular mechanism for rotational switching of the bacterial flagellar motor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 1041–1047 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Togashi, F., Yamaguchi, S., Kihara, M., Aizawa, S. I. & Macnab, R. M. An extreme clockwise switch bias mutation in fliG of Salmonella typhimurium and its suppression by slow-motile mutations in motA and motB. J. Bacteriol. 179, 2994–3003 (1997).
Google ScholarÂÂ
McDowell, M. A. et al. Characterisation of Shigella Spa33 and Thermotoga FliM/N reveals a new model for C-ring assembly in T3SS. Mol. Microbiol. 99, 749–766 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Bren, A. & Eisenbach, M. Changing the direction of flagellar rotation in bacteria by modulating the ratio between the rotational states of the switch protein FliM. J. Mol. Biol. 312, 699–709 (2001).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Bai, F. et al. Conformational spread as a mechanism for cooperativity in the bacterial flagellar switch. Science 327, 685–689 (2010).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Afanzar, O. et al. The switching mechanism of the bacterial rotary motor combines tight regulation with inherent flexibility. EMBO J. 40, e104683 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Sockett, H., Yamaguchi, S., Kihara, M., Irikura, V. M. & Macnab, R. M. Molecular analysis of the flagellar switch protein FliM of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 174, 793–806 (1992).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Bren, A. & Eisenbach, M. The N terminus of the flagellar switch protein, FliM, is the binding domain for the chemotactic response regulator, CheY. J. Mol. Biol. 278, 507–514 (1998).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Dyer, C. M., Vartanian, A. S., Zhou, H. & Dahlquist, F. W. A molecular mechanism of bacterial flagellar motor switching. J. Mol. Biol. 388, 71–84 (2009).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Kaplan, M. et al. Novel transient cytoplasmic rings stabilize assembling bacterial flagellar motors. EMBO J. 41, e109523 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Hou, Y. J. et al. Structural insights into the mechanism of c-di-GMP-bound YcgR regulating flagellar motility in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 808–821 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Ahn, D. R., Song, H., Kim, J., Lee, S. & Park, S. The crystal structure of an activated Thermotoga maritima CheY with N-terminal region of FliM. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 54, 76–83 (2013).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Iverson, T. M., Luna-Chavez, C., Croal, L. R., Cecchini, G. & Rees, D. C. Crystallographic studies of the Escherichia coli quinol-fumarate reductase with inhibitors bound to the quinol-binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 16124–16130 (2002).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Sarkar, M. K., Paul, K. & Blair, D. Chemotaxis signaling protein CheY binds to the rotor protein FliN to control the direction of flagellar rotation in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9370–9375 (2010).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Terashima, H., Kojima, S. & Homma, M. Site-directed crosslinking identifies the stator–rotor interaction surfaces in a hybrid bacterial flagellar motor. J. Bacteriol. 203, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00016-21 (2021).
Stock, D., Gibbons, C., Arechaga, I., Leslie, A. G. & Walker, J. E. The rotary mechanism of ATP synthase. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 672–679 (2000).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Kuhlen, L. et al. Structure of the core of the type III secretion system export apparatus. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 583–590 (2018).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Sheedlo, M. J. et al. Cryo-EM reveals species-specific components within the Helicobacter pylori Cag type IV secretion system core complex. Elife 9, e.59495 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Deme, J. C. et al. Structures of the stator complex that drives rotation of the bacterial flagellum. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1553–1564 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Santiveri, M. et al. Structure and function of stator units of the bacterial flagellar motor. Cell 183, 244–257 e216 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Hu, H. et al. Ion selectivity and rotor coupling of the Vibrio flagellar sodium-driven stator unit. Nat. Commun. 14, 4411 (2023).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Garcia-Seisdedos, H., Villegas, J. A. & Levy, E. D. Infinite assembly of folded proteins in evolution, disease, and engineering. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 58, 5514–5531 (2019).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Yuan, J., Branch, R. W., Hosu, B. G. & Berg, H. C. Adaptation at the output of the chemotaxis signalling pathway. Nature 484, 233–236 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Wadhwa, N., Phillips, R. & Berg, H. C. Torque-dependent remodeling of the bacterial flagellar motor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11764–11769 (2019).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Johnston, B. et al. BradyAJohnston/MolecularNodes: v2.8.1 for Blender 3.5+ (v2.8.1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8240420 (2023).
Iudin, A. et al. EMPIAR: the Electron Microscopy Public Image Archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1503–D1511 (2023).
Google ScholarÂÂ
The wwPDB Consortium. EMDB—the Electron Microscopy Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D456–D465 (2024).
Berman, H. M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Nishikino, T. et al. Structure of MotA, a flagellar stator protein, from hyperthermophile. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 631, 78–85 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Paul, K., Harmon, J. G. & Blair, D. F. Mutational analysis of the flagellar rotor protein FliN: identification of surfaces important for flagellar assembly and switching. J. Bacteriol. 188, 5240–5248 (2006).
Google ScholarÂÂ