Andreae, M. O. Determination of trace quantities of dimethylsulfoxide in aqueous solutions. Anal. Chem. 52, 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50051a035 (1980).
Google Scholar
De Mora, S., Lee, P., Grout, A., Schall, C. & Heumann, K. Aspects of the biogeochemistry of sulphur in glacial melt water ponds on the McMurdo Ice Shelf. Antarctica. Antarct. Sci. 8, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102096000041 (1996).
Google Scholar
Asher, E. C., Dacey, J. W. H., Jarniková, T. & Tortell, P. D. Measurement of DMS, DMSO, and DMSP in natural waters by automated sequential chemical analysis. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 13, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10039 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tebbe, D. A. et al. Microbial drivers of DMSO reduction and DMS-dependent methanogenesis in saltmarsh sediments. ISME J. 17, 2340–2351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01539-1 (2023).
Google Scholar
Schäfer, H., Myronova, N. & Boden, R. Microbial degradation of dimethylsulphide and related C1-sulphur compounds: Organisms and pathways controlling fluxes of sulphur in the biosphere. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp355 (2010).
Google Scholar
Zajáros, A., Szita, K., Matolcsy, K. & Horváth, D. Life cycle sustainability assessment of DMSO solvent recovery from hazardous waste water. Period. Polytech. Chem. Eng. 62, 305–309. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPch.11097 (2018).
Google Scholar
Notman, R., Noro, M., O’Malley, B. & Anwar, J. Molecular basis for dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) action on lipid membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 13982–13983. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja063363t (2006).
Google Scholar
Yoshiike, T. et al. Skin barrier defect in atopic dermatitis: Increased permeability of the stratum corneum using dimethyl sulfoxide and theophylline. J. Dermatol. Sci. 5, 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-1811(93)90076-2 (1993).
Google Scholar
Deng, Z. H. et al. Topical diclofenac therapy for osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Rheumatol. 35, 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-3021-z (2016).
Google Scholar
Tjernberg, A., Markova, N., Griffiths, W. J. & Hallén, D. DMSO-related effects in protein characterization. J. Biomol. Screen. 11, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057105284218 (2006).
Google Scholar
Hoang, B. X. et al. The rationality of implementation of dimethyl sulfoxide as differentiation-inducing agent in cancer therapy. Cancer Diagn. Progn. 3, 1–8 (2023).
Google Scholar
Peng, R. et al. Dimethyl sulfoxide, a potent oral radioprotective agent, confers radioprotection of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells independent of apoptosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 153, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.03.021 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shulyak, A. V. et al. Modern aspects of the use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Pharmacologyonline 1, 82–89 (2021).
Google Scholar
Awan, M. et al. Dimethyl sulfoxide: A central player since the dawn of cryobiology, is efficacy balanced by toxicity? Regen. Med. 15, 1463–1491. https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2019-0145 (2020).
Google Scholar
Phillis, J. W., Estevez, A. Y. & O’Regan, M. H. Protective effects of the free radical scavengers, dimethyl sulfoxide and ethanol, in cerebral ischemia in gerbils. Neurosci. Lett. 244, 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00139-6 (1998).
Google Scholar
Sanmartín-Suárez, C., Soto-Otero, R., Sánchez-Sellero, I. & Méndez-Álvarez, E. Antioxidant properties of dimethyl sulfoxide and its viability as a solvent in the evaluation of neuroprotective antioxidants. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 63, 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2010.10.004 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mizuno, M. et al. Cell membrane fluidity and ROS resistance define DMSO tolerance of cryopreserved synovial MSCs and HUVECs. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 13, 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02850-y (2022).
Google Scholar
Cao, X.-G., Li, X.-X., Bao, Y.-Z., Xing, N.-Z. & Chen, Y. Responses of human lens epithelial cells to quercetin and DMSO. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 3714–3718. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-1304 (2007).
Google Scholar
Sangweni, N. F. et al. The implication of low dose dimethyl sulfoxide on mitochondrial function and oxidative damage in cultured cardiac and cancer cells. Molecules 26, 7305. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237305 (2021).
Google Scholar
Galvao, J. et al. Unexpected low-dose toxicity of the universal solvent DMSO. FASEB J. 28, 1317–1330. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.13-235440 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yuan, Z., Zhao, B. & Zhang, Y. Effects of dimethylsulfoxide on behavior and antioxidant enzymes response of planarian Dugesia japonica. Toxicol. Ind. Health. 28, 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233711414609 (2012).
Google Scholar
Randhawa, M. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) inhibits the germination of Candida albicans and the arthrospores of Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Jpn. J. Med. Mycol. 49, 125–128. https://doi.org/10.3314/jjmm.49.125 (2008).
Google Scholar
Petruccelli, V., Brasili, E., Varone, L., Valletta, A. & Pasqua, G. Antifungal activity of dimethyl sulfoxide against Botrytis cinerea and phytotoxicity on tomato and lettuce plants. Plant Biosyst. 154, 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2020.1779846 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lewinska, A., Bilinski, T. & Bartosz, G. Limited effectiveness of antioxidants in the protection of yeast defective in antioxidant proteins. Free Radic. Res. 38, 1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760400009860 (2004).
Google Scholar
Koziol, S., Zagulski, M., Biliński, T. & Bartosz, G. Antioxidants protect the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae against hypertonic stress. Free Radic. Res. 39, 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760500045855 (2005).
Google Scholar
Wallace, M. A., Bailey, S., Fukuto, J. M., Valentine, J. S. & Gralla, E. B. Induction of phenotypes resembling CuZn-superoxide dismutase deletion in wild-type yeast cells: An in vivo assay for the role of superoxide in the toxicity of redox-cycling compounds. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 18, 1279–2186. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx050050n (2005).
Google Scholar
Sadowska-Bartosz, I., Pączka, A., Mołoń, M. & Bartosz, G. Dimethyl sulfoxide induces oxidative stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12091 (2013).
Google Scholar
Święciło, A., Krawiec, Z., Wawryn, J., Bartosz, G. & Biliński, T. Effect of stress on the life span of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Biochim. Pol. 42, 355–364 (2000).
Google Scholar
Krzepiłko, A. et al. Ascorbate restores lifespan of superoxide-dismutase deficient yeast. Free Radic. Res. 38, 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760410001717327 (2004).
Google Scholar
Wawryn, J., Święciło, A., Bartosz, G. & Biliński, T. Effect of superoxide dismutase deficiency on the life span of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. An oxygen-independent role of Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1570, 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(02)00197-6 (2002).
Google Scholar
Święciło, A. Role of monophenols in the recovery process of wild-type yeast cells subjected to severe environmental stress. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 63, 187–191. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10222-012-0084-2 (2013).
Google Scholar
Biliński, T., Krawiec, Z., Liczmański, A. & Litwińska, J. Is hydroxyl radical generated by the Fenton reaction in vivo? Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 130, 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(85)90449-8 (1985).
Google Scholar
Rodrigues-Pousada, C., Nevitt, T. & Menezes, R. The yeast stress response. Role of the Yap family of b-ZIP transcription factors. The FEBS J. 272, 2639–2647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04695.x (2005).
Google Scholar
Elfving, N. et al. A dynamic interplay of nucleosome and Msn2 binding regulates kinetics of gene activation and repression following stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 5468–5482. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku176 (2014).
Google Scholar
Święciło, A. Cross-stress resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast-new insight into an old phenomenon. Cell Stress Chaperon. 21, 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-016-0667-7 (2016).
Google Scholar
Zakrzewska, A. et al. Genome-wide analysis of yeast stress survival and tolerance acquisition to analyze the central trade-off between growth rate and cellular robustness. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 4435–4446. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0721 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bishayee, A., Rao, D. V., Bouchet, L. G., Bolch, W. E. & Howell, R. W. Protection by DMSO against cell death caused by intracellularly localized iodine-125, iodine-131 and polonium-210. Radiat. Res. 153, 416–427 (2000).
Google Scholar
Hubalek, Z. Protectants used in the cryopreservation of microorganisms. Cryobiology 46, 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00046-4 (2003).
Google Scholar
Li, X., Wang, Y. K., Song, Z. Q., Du, Z. Q. & Yang, C. X. Dimethyl sulfoxide perturbs cell cycle progression and spindle organization in porcine meiotic oocytes. PLoS ONE 11, e0158074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158074 (2016).
Google Scholar
Tunçer, S. et al. Low dose dimethyl sulfoxide driven gross molecular changes have the potential to interfere with various cellular processes. Sci. Rep. 8, 14828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33234-z (2018).
Google Scholar
Gallardo-Villagrán, M., Paulus, L., Leger, D. Y., Therrien, B. & Liagre, B. Dimethyl sulfoxide: A bio-friendly or bio-hazard chemical? The effect of DMSO in human fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Molecules 27, 4472. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144472 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yuan, C. et al. Dimethyl sulfoxide damages mitochondrial integrity and membrane potential in cultured astrocytes. PLoS ONE 9, e107447. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107447 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gironi, B. et al. Effect of DMSO on the mechanical and structural properties of model and biological membranes. Biophys. J. 119, 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2020.05.037 (2020).
Google Scholar
de Ménorval, M. A., Mir, L. M., Fernández, M. L. & Reigada, R. Effects of dimethyl sulfoxide in cholesterol-containing lipid membranes: A comparative study of experiments in silico and with cells. PLoS ONE 7, e41733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041733 (2012).
Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. & Nielsen, J. Metabolic trade-offs in yeast are caused by F1F0-ATP synthase. Sci. Rep. 6, 22264. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22264 (2016).
Google Scholar
Drakulic, T. et al. Involvement of oxidative stress response genes in redox homeostasis, the level of reactive oxygen species, and ageing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 5, 1215–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.06.001 (2005).
Google Scholar
Herrero, E., Ros, J., Bellí, G. & Cabiscol, E. Redox control and oxidative stress in yeast cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1780, 1217–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.12.004 (2008).
Google Scholar
Stratford, M., Vallières, C., Geoghegan, I. A., Archer, D. B. & Avery, S. V. The preservative sorbic acid targets respiration, explaining the resistance of fermentative spoilage yeast species. mSphere 5, e00273-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00273-20 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barakat, R., Goubet, I., Manon, S., Bergès, T. & Rosenfeld, E. Unsuspected pyocyanin effect in yeast under anaerobiosis. MicrobiologyOpen 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.142 (2014).
Google Scholar
Phetruen, T., van Dam, B. & Chanarat, S. Andrographolide induces ROS-mediated cytotoxicity, lipid peroxidation, and compromised cell integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antioxidants 12, 1765. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12091765 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lewinska, A. & Bartosz, G. A role for yeast glutaredoxin genes in selenite-mediated oxidative stress. Fungal Genet. Biol. 45, 1182–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2008.05.011 (2008).
Google Scholar
Dickinson, Q. et al. Mechanism of imidazolium ionic liquids toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and rational engineering of a tolerant, xylose-fermenting strain. Microb. Cell Fact. 15, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0417-7 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sousa, C. A. & Soares, E. V. Mitochondria are the main source and one of the targets of Pb (lead)-induced oxidative stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 5153–5160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5631-9 (2014).
Google Scholar
Święciło, A. Effect of sodium nitrate (V) on Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains of different antioxidative status and energetic metabolism. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 58, 41–44 (2008).
Gibson, B. R., Lawrence, S. J., Leclaire, J. P., Powell, C. D. & Smart, K. A. Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 31, 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00076.x (2007).
Google Scholar
Lai, L. C., Kosorukoff, A. L., Burke, P. V. & Kwast, K. E. Dynamical remodeling of the transcriptome during short-term anaerobiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Differential response and role of Msn2 and/or Msn4 and other factors in galactose and glucose media. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 4075–4091. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.10.4075-4091.2005 (2005).
Google Scholar
Verghese, J., Abrams, J., Wang, Y. & Morano, K. A. Biology of the heat shock response and protein chaperones: Budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a model system Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 76, 115–158. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.05018-11 (2012).
Google Scholar
Auesukaree, C. Molecular mechanisms of the yeast adaptive response and tolerance to stresses encountered during ethanol fermentation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 124, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.03.009 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rintala, E. et al. Low oxygen levels as a trigger for enhancement of respiratory metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genom. 10, 461. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-461 (2009).
Google Scholar
Aceituno, F. F. et al. Oxygen response of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 grown under carbon-sufficient, nitrogen-limited enological conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 8340–8352. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02305-12 (2012).
Google Scholar
Jouhten, P. et al. Oxygen dependence of metabolic fluxes and energy generation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113–1A. BMC Syst. Biol. 2, 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-2-60 (2008).
Google Scholar
Spickett, C. M., Smirnoff, N. & Pitt, A. R. The biosynthesis of erythroascorbate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its role as an antioxidant. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 28, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00214-2 (2000).
Google Scholar
Wu, M. J. et al. An antioxidant screening assay based on oxidant-induced growth arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 11, 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00726.x (2011).
Google Scholar
Branduardi, P. et al. Biosynthesis of vitamin C by yeast leads to increased stress resistance. PLoS ONE 2, e1092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001092 (2007).
Google Scholar
Pérez-Gallardo, R. V. et al. Reactive oxygen species production induced by ethanol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases because of a dysfunctional mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster assembly system. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 804–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12090 (2013).
Google Scholar
Navrátilová, A., Kovár, M. & Požgajová, M. Ascorbic acid mitigates cadmium-induced stress, and contributes to ionome stabilization in fission yeast. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 28, 15380–15393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11480-x (2021).
Google Scholar
Palozza, P. & Krinsky, N. I. Antioxidant effects of carotenoids in vivo and in vitro: An overview. Methods Enzymol. 213, 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(92)13142-k (1992).
Google Scholar
Przybyło, M. & Langner, M. On the physiological and cellular homeostasis of ascorbate. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 25, 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11658-020-00223-y (2020).
Google Scholar
Krzepiłko, A. & Święciło, A. Do antioxidants counteract the toxic effects of pyrethroids on Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast? Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 16, 1171–1178 (2009).
Biliński, T., Lukaszkiewicz, J. & Sledziewski, A. Demonstration of anaerobic catalase synthesis in the cz1 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 83, 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(78)91525-5 (1978).
Google Scholar
Jiménez, A. et al. The biological activity of the wine anthocyanins delphinidin and petunidin is mediated through Msn2 and Msn4 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 10, 858–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00679.x (2010).
Google Scholar
Sherman, F., Fink, G. R. & Hicks, J. B. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Manual. Plainview. NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 256 (1994).
Święciło, A. & Rybczyńska-Tkaczyk, K. Resazurin method for evaluation of bioactive compounds from cranberry extracts using the metabolic activity of a Δsod1 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast under severe osmotic stress. J. AOAC Int. 103, 422–427. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.19-0264 (2020).
Google Scholar
O’Brien, J., Wilson, I., Orton, T. & Pognan, F. Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity: Resazurin as a cytotoxicity assay. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 5421–5426. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01606.x (2000).
Google Scholar
Wieser, R. et al. Heat shock factor-independent heat control of transcription of the CTT1 gene encoding the cytosolic catalase T of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 12406–12411 (1991).
Google Scholar
Beers, R. F. & Sizer, J. W. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J. Biol. Chem. 195, 133–138 (1952).
Google Scholar
Bradford, M. M. Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 (1976).
Google Scholar
Martins, D. & English, A. Catalase activity is stimulated by H2O2 in rich culture medium and is required for H2O2 resistance and adaptation in yeast. Redox Biol. 2, 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2013.12.019 (2014).
Google Scholar
Piechowiak, T. & Balawejder, M. Onion skin extract as a protective agent against oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induced by cadmium. J. Food Biochem. 43, e12872. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12872 (2019).
Google Scholar
Konuk, H. & Ergüden, B. Antifungal activity of various essential oils against Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on disruption of cell membrane integrity. BIOCELL 41, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.32604/biocell.2017.41.013 (2017).
Li, C. et al. Analysis of the tendency for the electronic conductivity to change during alcoholic fermentation. Sci. Rep. 9, 5512. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41225-x (2019).
Google Scholar
Saffi, J., Sonego, L., Varela, Q. D. & Salvador, M. Antioxidant activity of L-ascorbic acid in wild-type and superoxide dismutase deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Redox Rep. 11, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1179/135100006X116691 (2006).
Google Scholar
Święciło, A. et al. Application of growth tests employing a ∆sod1 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study the antioxidant activity of berry fruit extracts. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 92, 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.04.046 (2018).
Google Scholar