Antibiotic resistance (2023, accessed May 2023). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance.
Urban-Chmiel, R. et al. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria—a review. Antibiotics 11, 1079 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Bush, K. et al. Tackling antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 894–896 (2011).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Murray, C. J. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. The Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
O’Neill, J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations (2016, accessed May 2023). https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/160518_Final%20paper_with%20cover.pdf.
Mann, A., Nehra, K., Rana, J. S. & Dahiya, T. Antibiotic resistance in agriculture: Perspectives on upcoming strategies to overcome upsurge in resistance. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 202, 100030 (2021).
Morris, S. & Cerceo, E. Trends, epidemiology, and management of multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospitalized setting. Antibiotics 9, 196 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Moretta, A. et al. Antimicrobial peptides: A new hope in biomedical and pharmaceutical fields. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11, 668632 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Brogden, K. A. Antimicrobial peptides: Pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria?. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 238–250 (2005).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Turner, K. B., Dean, S. N. & Walper, S. A. Bacterial Bioreactors: Outer Membrane Vesicles for Enzyme Encapsulation. Methods In Enzymology 187–31216 (Academic Press Inc., 2019).
Sood, R. & Kinnunen, P. K. J. Cholesterol, lanosterol, and ergosterol attenuate the membrane association of LL-37(W27F) and temporin L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 341778, 1460–1466 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Brender, J. R., McHenry, A. J. & Ramamoorthy, A. Does cholesterol play a role in the bacterial selectivity of antimicrobial peptides?. Front. Immunol. 3, 31501 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Torres, M. D. T. et al. Decoralin analogs with increased resistance to degradation and lower hemolytic activity. Chem. Select 2, 18–23 (2017).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Somma, A. et al. Antibiofilm properties of temporin-l on Pseudomonas fluorescens in static and in-flow conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–17 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Torres, M. D. T. et al. Natural and redesigned wasp venom peptides with selective antitumoral activity. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 14, 1693–1703 (2018).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Ramesh, S., Govender, T., Kruger, H. G., de la Torre, B. G. & Albericio, F. Short AntiMicrobial Peptides (SAMPs) as a class of extraordinary promising therapeutic agents. J. Peptide Sci. 22, 438–451 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Wadhwani, P. et al. Dynamical structure of the short multifunctional peptide BP100 in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembr. 1838, 940–949 (2014).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Misiewicz, J. et al. Action of the multifunctional peptide BP100 on native biomembranes examined by solid-state NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 61, 287–298 (2015).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Grau-Campistany, A. et al. Hydrophobic mismatch demonstrated for membranolytic peptides and their use as molecular rulers to measure bilayer thickness in native cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–9 (2015).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Grau-Campistany, A., Strandberg, E., Wadhwani, P., Rabanal, F. & Ulrich, A. S. Extending the hydrophobic mismatch concept to amphiphilic membranolytic peptides. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1116–1120 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Manzini, M. C. et al. Peptide: Lipid ratio and membrane surface charge determine the mechanism of action of the antimicrobial peptide BP100. Conformational and functional studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1838, 1985–1999 (2014).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Melo, M. N., Ferre, R. & Castanho, M. A. R. B. Antimicrobial peptides: Linking partition, activity and high membrane-bound concentrations. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009(7), 245–250 (2009).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Shai, Y. Mechanism of the binding, insertion and destabilization of phospholipid bilayer membranes by α-helical antimicrobial and cell non-selective membrane-lytic peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembr. 1462, 55–70 (1999).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Carretero, G. P. B. et al. Synthesis, biophysical and functional studies of two BP100 analogues modified by a hydrophobic chain and a cyclic peptide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1860, 1502–1516 (2018).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Mink, C. et al. Overlapping properties of the short membrane-active peptide BP100 with (i) Polycationic TAT and (ii) α-helical magainin family peptides. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11, 350 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Palmer, N., Maasch, J. R. M. A., Torres, M. D. T. & De La Fuente-Nunez, C. Molecular dynamics for antimicrobial peptide discovery. Infect. Immun. 89, 4 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Ulmschneider, J. P. & Ulmschneider, M. B. Molecular dynamics simulations are redefining our view of peptides interacting with biological membranes. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1106–1116 (2018).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Aronica, P. G. A. et al. Computational methods and tools in antimicrobial peptide research. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 3172–3196 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Leontiadou, H., Mark, A. E. & Marrink, S. J. Antimicrobial peptides in action. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 12156–12161 (2006).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Wang, Y., Chen, C. H., Hu, D., Ulmschneider, M. B. & Ulmschneider, J. P. Spontaneous formation of structurally diverse membrane channel architectures from a single antimicrobial peptide. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–9 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Bond, P. J., Parton, D. L., Clark, J. F. & Sansom, M. S. P. Coarse-grained simulations of the membrane-active antimicrobial peptide maculatin 1.1. Biophys. J. 95, 3802–3815 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Thøgersen, L., Schiøtt, B., Vosegaard, T., Nielsen, N. C. & Tajkhorshid, E. Peptide aggregation and pore formation in a lipid bilayer: A combined coarse-grained and all atom molecular dynamics study. Biophys. J. 95, 4337–4347 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Rzepiela, A. J., Sengupta, D., Goga, N. & Marrink, S. J. Membrane poration by antimicrobial peptides combining atomistic and coarse-grained descriptions. Faraday Discuss. 144, 431–443 (2009).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Santo, K. P. & Berkowitz, M. L. Difference between magainin-2 and melittin assemblies in phosphatidylcholine bilayers: Results from coarse-grained simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 3021–3030 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Su, J., Marrink, S. J. & Melo, M. N. Localization preference of antimicrobial peptides on liquid-disordered membrane domains. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 350 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Badosa, E. et al. A library of linear undecapeptides with bactericidal activity against phytopathogenic bacteria. Peptides N. Y. 28, 2276–2285 (2007).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Park, P. et al. Binding and flip as initial steps for BP-100 antimicrobial actions. Sci. Rep. 9, 8622 (2019).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Franco, L. R. et al. Simulations reveal that antimicrobial BP100 induces local membrane thinning, slows lipid dynamics and favors water penetration. RSC Adv. 12, 4573–4588 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Miao, X. et al. Enhanced cell selectivity of hybrid peptides with potential antimicrobial activity and immunomodulatory effect. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2020, 1864 (2020).
Woolley, G. A. & Deber, C. M. Peptides in membranes: Lipid-induced secondary structure of substance P. Biopolymers 26, S109–S121 (1987).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Konno, K. et al. Decoralin, a novel linear cationic α-helical peptide from the venom of the solitary eumenine wasp Oreumenes decoratus. Peptides N.Y. 28, 2320–2327 (2007).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Rinaldi, A. C. et al. Temporin L: Antimicrobial, haemolytic and cytotoxic activities, and effects on membrane permeabilization in lipid vesicles. Biochem. J. 368, 91–100 (2002).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Carotenuto, A. et al. A different molecular mechanism underlying antimicrobial and hemolytic actions of temporins A and L. J. Med. Chem. 51, 2354–2362 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Zhao, H. & Kinnunen, P. K. J. Binding of the antimicrobial peptide temporin L to liposomes assessed by Trp fluorescence. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 25170–25177 (2002).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Guerra, M. E. R. et al. MD simulations and multivariate studies for modeling the antileishmanial activity of peptides. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 90, 501–510 (2017).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Ferguson, P. M. et al. Temporin B forms hetero-oligomers with temporin L, modifies its membrane activity, and increases the cooperativity of its antibacterial pharmacodynamic profile. Biochemistry 61, 1029–1040 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Manzo, G. et al. Temporin L and aurein 2.5 have identical conformations but subtly distinct membrane and antibacterial activities. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Wang, G., Li, X. & Wang, Z. APD3: The antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1087–D1093 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435–447 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Van Der Spoel, D. et al. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701–1718 (2005).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1, 19–25 (2015).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Beauchamp, K. A., Lin, Y. S., Das, R. & Pande, V. S. Are protein force fields getting better? A systematic benchmark on 524 diverse NMR measurements. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1409–1414 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Jämbeck, J. P. M. M. & Lyubartsev, A. P. An extension and further validation of an all-atomistic force field for biological membranes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 2938–2948 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Jämbeck, J. P. M. & Lyubartsev, A. P. Derivation and systematic validation of a refined all-atom force field for phosphatidylcholine lipids. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 3164–3179 (2012).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Jämbeck, J. P. M. & Lyubartsev, A. P. Another piece of the membrane puzzle: Extending slipids further. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 774–784 (2013).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Martinez, L. et al. PACKMOL: A package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2157–2164 (2009).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577 (1995).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126 (2007).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Santos, D. E. S., Pontes, F. J. S., Lins, R. D., Coutinho, K. & Soares, T. A. SuAVE: A tool for analyzing curvature-dependent properties in chemical interfaces. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 473–484 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Marrink, S. J., Risselada, H. J., Yefimov, S., Tieleman, D. P. & De Vries, A. H. The MARTINI force field: Coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 7812–7824 (2007).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Monticelli, L. et al. The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: Extension to proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 819–834 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Souza, P. C. T. et al. Martini 3: A general purpose force field for coarse-grained molecular dynamics. Nat. Methods 18, 382–388 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Kroon, P. C. et al. Martinize2 and vermouth: Unified framework for topology generation. arXiv:2212.01191 (2022).
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: A web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Qi, Y. et al. CHARMM-GUI martini maker for coarse-grained simulations with the martini force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 4486–4494 (2015).
Google ScholarÂÂ
De Jong, D. H., Baoukina, S., Ingólfsson, H. I. & Marrink, S. J. Martini straight: Boosting performance using a shorter cutoff and GPUs. Comput. Phys. Commun. 199, 1–7 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Santos, D. E. S., Coutinho, K. & Soares, T. A. Surface assessment via grid evaluation (SuAVE) for every surface curvature and cavity shape. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 4690–4701 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Grage, S. L., Afonin, S., Kara, S., Buth, G. & Ulrich, A. S. Membrane thinning and thickening induced by membrane-active amphipathic peptides. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 4, 202784 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Polyansky, A. A. et al. Antimicrobial peptides induce growth of phosphatidylglycerol domains in a model bacterial membrane. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 3108–3111 (2010).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Steinkühler, J. et al. Controlled division of cell-sized vesicles by low densities of membrane-bound proteins. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–11 (2020).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Pezeshkian, W. & Ipsen, J. H. Fluctuations and conformational stability of a membrane patch with curvature inducing inclusions. Soft Matter. 15, 9974–9981 (2019).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Ferre, R. et al. Synergistic effects of the membrane actions of cecropin-melittin antimicrobial hybrid peptide BP100. Biophys. J. 96, 1815–1827 (2009).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Zamora-Carreras, H. et al. Alanine scan and 2H NMR analysis of the membrane-active peptide BP100 point to a distinct carpet mechanism of action. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembranes. 1858, 1328–1338 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Woo, H. J. & Wallqvist, A. Spontaneous buckling of lipid bilayer and vesicle budding induced by antimicrobial peptide magainin 2: A coarse-grained simulation study. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 8122–8129 (2011).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Zhang, S. et al. Structure and formation mechanism of antimicrobial peptides temporin b-and l-induced tubular membrane protrusion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 11015 (2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Miyazaki, Y. & Shinoda, W. Cooperative antimicrobial action of melittin on lipid membranes: A coarse-grained molecular dynamics study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Biomembranes. 1864, 183955 (2022).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Safinya, C. R. & Rädler, J. O. Handbook of Lipid Membranes. Handbook of Lipid Membranes (CRC Press, 2021).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Zemel, A., Ben-Shaul, A. & May, S. Modulation of the spontaneous curvature and bending rigidity of lipid membranes by interfacially adsorbed amphipathic peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 6988–6996 (2008).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Tytler, E. M. et al. Reciprocal effects of apolipoprotein and lytic peptide analogs on membranes. Cross-sectional molecular shapes of amphipathic alpha helixes control membrane stability. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22112–22118 (1993).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Epand, R. M., Shai, Y., Segrest, J. P. & Anantharamiah, G. M. Mechanisms for the modulation of membrane bilayer properties by amphipathic helical peptides. Biopolymers 37, 319–338 (1995).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Decker, A. P., Mechesso, A. F. & Wang, G. Expanding the landscape of amino acid-rich antimicrobial peptides: Definition, deployment in nature, implications for peptide design and therapeutic potential. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23 (2022).
Srivastava, S., Kumar, A., Tripathi, A. K., Tandon, A. & Ghosh, J. K. Modulation of anti-endotoxin property of Temporin L by minor amino acid substitution in identified phenylalanine zipper sequence. Biochem. J. 473, 4045–4062 (2016).
Google ScholarÂÂ
Bennett, W. F. D. & Tieleman, D. P. Water defect and pore formation in atomistic and coarse-grained lipid membranes: Pushing the limits of coarse graining. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 37, 2981–2988 (2011).
Google ScholarÂÂ